If you have a clause in your contract for not being held liable for delay or non-delivery of the contracted cake based on unforeseen circumstances, acts of god, illness/death of immediate family, labor issues and strikes, supplier failure, etc. do you leave it at that, or do you state that there will be some refund of paid money if contracted cake is not provided.
I have seen it so many ways:
. a strict no liability if it isn't the bakery's fault the cake isn't delivered
. a difference if the unforeseen event happened before the cake was made (then a refund was allowed) or if the unforeseen event happened after the cake was made (no refund)
. a statement like above, but with an addition that if contracted cake isn't delivered, then there will be a refund of no more than the price of the cake. (does this imply that in some cases brides will go after the baker for *more* than the price of the cake in liability responsibility if a cake is not delivered? Say pain and suffering for not having her contracted wedding cake at the reception?)
Reason I bring this up is that i had the basic clause as stated at the top of the post but no mention of refunds based on uncontrollable circumstances. I got this well, analytical response from a groom tonight:
First of all, I didn't care for the couple and RED flags went up half staff (but I blamed it on underdeveloped social skills and that he was wearing his own 'red shirt' star trek uniform to get married in). And while I find his confrontational questioning off-putting, I do see his points on some level.
I am debating "elaborating" on his points back to him, or just stating that their wedding date has already been booked and writing the order off. While I do think that I personally would offer a refund in many circumstances, i don't want to change my contract on the pressuring of a rude groom. Ethically, I think if I have made the cake and something is preventing me from delivering it, say a swat team has blocked off my block and I can't get to the bakery, or the washes flooded and I can't navigate the roads, then that truly isn't my fault and that is where the couple's 'wedding insurance' kicks in. But if my child has just died (and thanks for the compassion there, buddy, for issues in my personal life not being your concern) and I am not able to make the cake then i would think a refund is in order.
I also like the idea of calling out a refund based on the price paid and no more. I guess that is some level of protection for the customer and non-delivery. Has a couple ever gone after MORE than the price paid for the cake if they weren't satisfied with it or did not receive it based on unforeseens?
As far as this couple goes, I didn't click with them and wonder if I should do the evasive "i've booked that day" (the tasting was a month ago, though the wedding is 8 months away), or explain to them that working with an artist for a service has a different set of rules and considerations than purchasing an electronics item, unpacking it from the box and expecting the product to be just as the other 500K items it was factory produced alongside. And the unprofessional side of me would like to add that "one of the benefits of being a commissioned baker and designer is that I have the opportunity to choose what projects I take on based on the design and my rapport with my potential clients. Based on this, I do not feel that I am a good fit for your wedding."
So I made a poll, but I would also like to hear your input and reasoning--or better yet real life experiences on the liability clauses in your contracts.
THank you so much!
I have seen it so many ways:
. a strict no liability if it isn't the bakery's fault the cake isn't delivered
. a difference if the unforeseen event happened before the cake was made (then a refund was allowed) or if the unforeseen event happened after the cake was made (no refund)
. a statement like above, but with an addition that if contracted cake isn't delivered, then there will be a refund of no more than the price of the cake. (does this imply that in some cases brides will go after the baker for *more* than the price of the cake in liability responsibility if a cake is not delivered? Say pain and suffering for not having her contracted wedding cake at the reception?)
Reason I bring this up is that i had the basic clause as stated at the top of the post but no mention of refunds based on uncontrollable circumstances. I got this well, analytical response from a groom tonight:
Quote:
Quote:
. One of the items listed is "accidents"; this item seems vague and is unclear what is being referred to. What is meant by accidents? Are you referring to car accidents or accidents such as dropping the cake?
. You mention "labor troubles, disputes, or strikes." I was unaware that your business has any employees besides yourself; what exactly is this referring to?
. You mention "delays in deliveries of supplies" and "non-performance of suppliers." I don't understand why should I the customer should be responsible for your internal business decisions such as which suppliers or shipping companies to use; could you please elaborate on this?
. You mention "illness, hospitalization, or death in the immediate family." I don't understand why should I the customer should be responsible for events in your personal life; could you please elaborate on this?
. I am not sure that I would be willing to sign this without a line amended to this item that stated in the event that a cake was not delivered as originally agreed that a full refund would be provided. Would you be willing to add this to the Wedding Cake Terms and Conditions?
. One of the items listed is "accidents"; this item seems vague and is unclear what is being referred to. What is meant by accidents? Are you referring to car accidents or accidents such as dropping the cake?
. You mention "labor troubles, disputes, or strikes." I was unaware that your business has any employees besides yourself; what exactly is this referring to?
. You mention "delays in deliveries of supplies" and "non-performance of suppliers." I don't understand why should I the customer should be responsible for your internal business decisions such as which suppliers or shipping companies to use; could you please elaborate on this?
. You mention "illness, hospitalization, or death in the immediate family." I don't understand why should I the customer should be responsible for events in your personal life; could you please elaborate on this?
. I am not sure that I would be willing to sign this without a line amended to this item that stated in the event that a cake was not delivered as originally agreed that a full refund would be provided. Would you be willing to add this to the Wedding Cake Terms and Conditions?
First of all, I didn't care for the couple and RED flags went up half staff (but I blamed it on underdeveloped social skills and that he was wearing his own 'red shirt' star trek uniform to get married in). And while I find his confrontational questioning off-putting, I do see his points on some level.
I am debating "elaborating" on his points back to him, or just stating that their wedding date has already been booked and writing the order off. While I do think that I personally would offer a refund in many circumstances, i don't want to change my contract on the pressuring of a rude groom. Ethically, I think if I have made the cake and something is preventing me from delivering it, say a swat team has blocked off my block and I can't get to the bakery, or the washes flooded and I can't navigate the roads, then that truly isn't my fault and that is where the couple's 'wedding insurance' kicks in. But if my child has just died (and thanks for the compassion there, buddy, for issues in my personal life not being your concern) and I am not able to make the cake then i would think a refund is in order.
I also like the idea of calling out a refund based on the price paid and no more. I guess that is some level of protection for the customer and non-delivery. Has a couple ever gone after MORE than the price paid for the cake if they weren't satisfied with it or did not receive it based on unforeseens?
As far as this couple goes, I didn't click with them and wonder if I should do the evasive "i've booked that day" (the tasting was a month ago, though the wedding is 8 months away), or explain to them that working with an artist for a service has a different set of rules and considerations than purchasing an electronics item, unpacking it from the box and expecting the product to be just as the other 500K items it was factory produced alongside. And the unprofessional side of me would like to add that "one of the benefits of being a commissioned baker and designer is that I have the opportunity to choose what projects I take on based on the design and my rapport with my potential clients. Based on this, I do not feel that I am a good fit for your wedding."
So I made a poll, but I would also like to hear your input and reasoning--or better yet real life experiences on the liability clauses in your contracts.
THank you so much!












