I have never heard of chocolate being divided into cooking and eating chocolate It would be interesting to hear how Le Cordon Bleu makes that distinction.
Rather, if you are going to cook with it, adding other ingredients like cream or adding it to cake batter, you don't have to temper chocolate (though some people think you'll have better results even then, if the chocolate is in temper)
However, I think kmstreepey is correct that if you have chocolate (eating or coooking) and it is in temper--having survived the distribution process-- and you manage to melt it without raising the temperature over about 88 degrees (a little less for milk or white) and you don't get any trace of moisture or steam into it, you may be able to preserve he temper. Alas, even that is not as simple as it sounds.
Rather, if you are going to cook with it, adding other ingredients like cream or adding it to cake batter, you don't have to temper chocolate (though some people think you'll have better results even then, if the chocolate is in temper)
However, I think kmstreepey is correct that if you have chocolate (eating or coooking) and it is in temper--having survived the distribution process-- and you manage to melt it without raising the temperature over about 88 degrees (a little less for milk or white) and you don't get any trace of moisture or steam into it, you may be able to preserve he temper. Alas, even that is not as simple as it sounds.







